All blog posts
Illustration with person on laptop managing internal metadata.
Data & AI
,

Apache Kafka version 3.3 goes live

Avatar female
This is some text inside of a div block.
October 7, 2022
Avatar Taha Akbas
Taha Akbas
&
October 7, 2022
Kafka 3.3 is out – and introduces an important change of internal metadata management. The Apache Kafka Project is parting ways with ZooKeeper in order to make room for its successor KRraft, a self managed metadata quorum.

Introduction of ZooKeeper’s successor

Apache Kafka 3.3 heralds the end of ZooKeeper for internal metadata management: It is replaced by the solution-internal tool Kafka Raft (KRaft). KRaft was first introduced with the release of Kafka 2.8 as the successor to ZooKeeper, which managed distributed, open-source configuration and synchronization, as well as name registries for distributed applications in Kafka so far. However, KRaft remained in Early Access state since its release in spring 2021 and was not intended for production use – until now! With this week’s release of Kafka 3.3, KRaft has been granted «Production-Ready» status. This means that KRaft can now be deployed to new Kafka clusters.

Reasons for switching to KRaft

There are several reasons why Apache Kafka project managers have opted for a self-managed metadata quorum for the future. On the one hand, the move to KRaft aims to break the dependency on ZooKeeper and thus reduce the overall complexity of the Kafka architecture. In addition, the elimination of ZooKeeper simplifies both administration and operation of Kafka clusters, as separate components are no longer required to manage the controller. Other benefits of KRaft include faster failover times in the event of controller downtime, as well as a massive improvement in partition scaling. Particularly for this reason it is worthwhile for Kafka project administrators to switch from ZooKeeper to KRaft.  

Is KRaft backwards compatible?

But what can those without the luxury of a greenfield approach do? At present, existing Kafka clusters managed with ZooKeeper cannot be migrated to KRaft yet. Such functionality will be available with the next release planned for the end of 2022 at the earliest: The experimental support for migration from ZooKeeper to KRaft is then to follow with Kafka 3.4. However, effective migration of productive clusters to KRaft will not be possible until Bridge Release 3.5. But don’t worry: Currently, the transition phase to KRaft has just begun. Although ZooKeeper is expected to be deprecated as of Kafka 3.5, it will probably not give way to its successor until Kafka 4.0, leaving enough time for a clean migration to KRaft.

FAQ’s

Frequently asked questions

No items found.

Table of contents

Table of Content

Written by
Author Portrait
This is some text inside of a div block.
October 7, 2022
Avatar Taha Akbas
Taha Akbas
&
October 7, 2022
Share this blog post
Author Portrait
This is some text inside of a div block.
October 7, 2022

Related Blog Posts

Electronic signatures – mesoneer & Swisscom Trust Services
Digital signatures are only as secure as the provider behind them – but how can you recognize a trustworthy service? Qualified Trust Service Providers (QTSPs) play a central role when it comes to legally valid and tamper-proof electronic signatures. Find out what a QTSP is and why mesoneer relies on Swisscom Trust Services.
Read more
Franziska Klein
 | 
07.10.2025
Electronic Signatures for Pension Funds
Digitalization does not stop at occupational pension provision. Many processes in pension funds are already digital today, but one key element often remains paper-based: the signature. An electronic signature for pension funds in accordance with the Swiss ZertES offers enormous potential here – both for the pension funds themselves and for manufacturers of industry-specific management software.
Read more
Franziska Klein
 | 
11.09.2025
Electronic Signatures for Asset Managers
The financial sector is under increasing pressure: efficiency gains, regulatory compliance, sustainability, and rising customer expectations dominate daily operations – especially in wealth management. Electronic signatures are a key tool to successfully address these challenges. But what truly matters for asset managers? And how can digitization be implemented in a legally compliant, secure, and customer-friendly way?
Read more
Franziska Klein
 | 
01.09.2025
View More